#Word Processor Survey
18-Jun-90 11:46:18
Sb: #35003-#Word Processor Survey
Fm: Scott Harris 73717,1162
To: Donald Gross 75006,1057
I'm not saying that there's nothing usable, or even quite good, on the
Amiga, just that there's nothing in quite the same league.
I'm sure Superbase Professional is good (and no, it's not available on the
Mac). But is it comparable to 4th Dimension, Double Helix, or Omnis 5 on
the Mac? Since it sounds like neither of us has tried both Superbase Pro
_and_ one of the Mac high-end db's, we can't speak with authority – perhaps
there is someone else here who can chime in with a good comparison. Other
good Mac databases include Foxbase Mac, FileMaker, and Panorama, although
they're generaly a step-down in cost and functionality (either not
multi-user, or not fully relational, or not suited for creating a
stand-alone environment – i.e. something someone could operate without
knowing anything about (or even realizing they were essentially using) the
database program itself, etc.).
Similarly, I believe that the Amiga WordPerfect is at least a generation
behind it's MS-DOS and Mac counterparts – and the Mac version has generally
been considered the weakest of the "high-end" wp's on the Mac (although
their first major update on the Mac, scheduled for later this year, sounds
like it could be a winner).
And I don't think that Amiga DTP is yet comparable to the Mac, even the
Mac's low-end (defined as "under $500 list" <g>) like Ready-Set-Go or
Publish-It, much less XPress 2 (3 next month) or PageMaker 4, or the very
high-end specialized DTP apps.
Again, all of this is from using the Mac programs but only reading about
the Amiga equivalents. If anyone here has used the top programs in both
environments, I'd like to hear your thoughts.
I'm not looking to start at RWar – I concede that the Amiga has many
advantages over the Mac in some areas, but it seems to lag behind in most
"traditional" applications. ===Scott