worse than shovelware
05-Jun-93 07:32:28
Sb: #49805-worse than shovelware
Fm: Chris Ness 71321,673
To: John L. Sands 71214,2750
I wasn't complaining abt the quality of the disk, I was complaining about
re-issuing the disk under different dress and name without clearly marking that
it was a re-issue of the same disk. A person doesn't need to buy two copies
(even if it wasn't originally free). The disk itself is fine.
One thing I have been trying to figure out; did they silkscreen over your
original silkscreening? Or were they blank? The producers ID etched at the hub
even shows the same batch number. If the silkscreened over, they did a good
job. There is no evidence of the lower silkscreen.