#Thanks for the INFO.
10-Jun-94 15:37:36
Sb: #106959-#Thanks for the INFO.
Fm: Don Landis 71673,3612
To: Todd Dunbar 71664,1447
The broadcast "quality" (whatever that means since it has no definition
standard) of the PAR and the UVW-1800 is well documented. First the, the PAR
was used in an animation last year (amiga version) to lay work to a BVW series
recorder and it happened to win an award. It was a State of Florida commercial
titled "Fresh to You" Second I have been using the combo here since March and
the only questions that ever came up has been from people like yourself that
arn't in a position to evaluate first hand the quality of the output. You will
also find others that have a substantial $ investment in the higher end Abekas
and BVW series decks will vehemently talk the PAR down as not being capable of
broadcast "quality". In my opinion these are the BVW/abekas snobs and have
obvious investments to protect.
As a personal example: I won a bid for an animation job that was shown to an
audience of 3000 on a 20 foot screen. This same animation was then used in a
series on commercials shown on the local broadcast stations for the past 60
days. The client has returned to have me do a new piece for another meeting
that I delivered yesterday. They are very pleased with the way my animation
projected. This was a far more stringent requirement for video quality than
broadcast ever is.
Recommendations: Make sure you get the remote shuttle controller so you can
jog shuttle the UVW, unless, you have an RS-422 edit controller to do this. It
is not necessary to get the TBC remote unless you are constantly taking in
other's video that is screwed up. Otherwise you may need this. The remote is
very simple circuit and I built my own here because I do use other's source
beta tapes. The PAR with the Micropolis 2210A is a top performer. Some have
reported problems with the 2217A drive but I'm not sure that it's the drive or
just coincidence and operator SNAFU. Haven't heard any problems with the
2210A.
Good luck.