#NTSC>PAL conv quality?
16-Jun-94 23:02:09
Sb: #41968-#NTSC>PAL conv quality?
Fm: Glenn Scott 70523,1041
To: John Chang 73023,2000
John,
Thanks. I have my dup house dump my Hi8 masters to BetaCam SP and then
hang on to them in their vault. That has lots of advantages. For this initial
marketing trial, I'll get someone else to do the standards conversion. They
can probably do it, but I haven't called yet to quizz them about their
equipment. Between here and the BPFORUM I have a list of questions to ask.
Now that I know the quality is feasible, I have been working at setting up my
UK contacts. I do art and architecture documentaries, and I am working on a
big series on French architecture now, Romanesque and Gothic periods. It would
be nice to follow it up with a series on English architecture, since it ties in
so nicely. It has taken four trips to France to get the footage I am satisfied
with, including going back in the winter to some locations because trees were
in the way, and until I do a series on trees and their leaves, that wasn't any
good. Weather is always the big gamble, and I have had to go back hoping for
better weather. Sometimes the editing is interesting because I can make Spring
arrive with a simple fade.
For my purposes, which so far involves mostly European locations, perhaps
investing in a good PAL camcorder, and converting to NTSC might be something to
consider. Again the quality question comes up .. apart from a possible
generation loss, are you going to retain the same quality? Hi8 has worked very
well for me, and has many in-the-field advantages, not to mention luggage
advantages.