CompuServe Messages

#Sparks

    26-Jun-94 22:47:28
Sb: #85050-#Sparks
Fm: Charles D Steinkuehler 75020,1761
To: Erik Flom 71204,407
Have noticed the "any render time >0 needs acceleration" before. This is a rather impossible goal. If you said however, "any render time > effective frame rate needs acceleration" you might eventually get your wish. Real time rendering/ray tracing video resolution images in real time (1/60 sec to calculate 4.2 MHz video screen) is doable today with alternative archetecure processers (i.e. wierd supercomputer that is hard to program, but kicks butt on vectorized ray trace calculations). The hardware for such a machine could even be rather inexpensive (like < 50K) in low production quantities. The problem is amortizing the design cost of such a beast if you wern't going to sell as many as something like a Pentium. Anyway, now that you're all excited, sit back down, because even 'tho it's possible today, you probably won't see anything neat for 5 to 10 years, as the market gradually gets big enough to become 'interesting' to those with enough $$ (and know how) to make such things. In the short term remember you've already got the power of a couple of early Cray's lying around. Now if only you could get your hands on some of the processing power they have online at the NSA……