#PAR vs Options
Don – besides selling/configuring systems, we also offer rendering and
recording services to our clients that need them. In the course of this
endeavor, we have dealt with high-end non-linear systems as well as PC-based
systems, for animation, cinematic, and broadcast purposes.
So –
>>* How does the image quality of the PAR compare with other systems using
real-time decompression like the Animation X-Treme Motion X card from TVOne
Multimedia Solutions and DVision's CineWorks package using the Intel Action
Media (AM2) card ?. <<
The PAR acheives broadcast quality output throughout its
compression/decompression cycle. Output formats are composite, S-VHS, BetaCam
and MII.
>>* Does the PAR have any real competition in it's price range and if so, what
is it ?<<
If you want to retain your ISA system, then no. If you're considering a new
platform, the Targa 2000 (currently EISA based, PCI available soon) is a
comparable option.
>>* The PAR uses compression to store images. Will my output actually look
better using the PAR's 752×480 resolution vs the Targa's 512×486 frame by frame
recording technique ?<<
The PAR's compression is virtually lossless.
>>* Will the Sound Blaster Pro (16 Bit Stereo Sound Card) work with the PAR
and Razor Pro ?<<
Yes.
>>* Would a non-linear digital video system be a better value. . . ?<<
Our livelihood is dependent upon delivering cost-effective, high quality
solutions to our customers. WE, and they, deal with broadcast engineers (the
pickiest variety) on a day-to-day basis. For us, the PAR delivers.