CompuServe Messages

#Catch-22

    25-Jun-95 22:07:21
Sb: #Catch-22
Fm: Jerome R. Kalisz 75233,3464
To: All
A problem I had run into recently made me wonder how others have resolved similar circumstances. The problem is resolving the particular strengths and weaknesses of Autocad and 3D Studio. For example, when you have an object in 3DS that is going to be repeated in a way which can't be easily repeated in 3DS, but can in Autocad, and has complex mapping requirements, what can you do? Here is the particular circumstance I was dealing with… I was placing Auditorium seats in a large auditorium. The seats were drawn in Acad, and could easily enough be transferred to 3DS. However, 3DS' lack of CAD accuracy made accurate placement of the seats almost impossible by conventional methods, consisdering the sheer numbers of seats. Using polar arrays, guide arcs, object snaps and blocks, the placement of the seats wasn't THAT difficult in Acad. This is the kicker: Each seat requires several different mapping planes to look halfway acceptable. Mapping ALL those seats individually could take many, many hours. If I mapped one seat properly, copying the other seats would work, but, as I mentioned, such placement would be very difficult in 3DS, and hence could take many hours. There is the quandry. A catch-22, if you will. Place the seats in Acad, and you're faced with difficulty in mapping. Map the seat and copy it in 3DS, and you've got difficulty in placement. How would others handle this? Naturally, there's always one answer which might be easier for each individual, but I'm wonderingif there's a way to get around this. If 3DS had the capability to use one particular object as a protoype, like a BLOCK in Acad, in which changes made to mapping could then be applied automatically to the other unmapped seats placed in Acad, it would be easier. If there were a way to automatically map objects in 3DS, it would be easier. If you could use polar arrays and snaps in 3DS, it would be easier. Even beind able to see the object as it is moved would help, instead of only being able to see a bounding box as you move it. If you could apply mapping in Acad, this would help, as well. I just wondered if there were any time saving short cuts anyone had invented out there for such situations. Thanx! -jk