#040 Accelerator
09-Jul-91 08:14:44
Sb: #27756-#040 Accelerator
Fm: Ray Lewis 76057,467
To: John Pendergrass 76246,676
John:
From the January, 1991 _BYTE_, article by Tim Holloway, "The
object-oriented Amiga Exec", quote from page 334:
"Nothing in the basic design of Exec actually requires only a single CPU to
be present in the system. Exec could be implemented in a multiprocessor
system if access to system lists were properly serialized. Amiga 2500
systems contain a 68000 and a 68020 (or 68030). At present, one or the
other is put to sleep at boot time, but there are possibilities here."
Also, from page 3 of Commodore's "A2286/A2088 Bridgeboard User's Guide":
"One of the most powerful features of the Amiga/Bridgeboard design is the
ability to run software tailored specifically to take advantage of the
combined strengths of the Amiga and PC systems. For example, a hybrid
A2286 system using 80286 and 80287 processors on the PC side could be
performing process monitoring while the 68XXX series processor on the Amiga
side is handling real-time graphics display of the process monitoring."
Why haven't we seen either of these things from either CBM or third party
tech wizards? Or have they been done, but quietly?
?|^] Ray Lewis