#CD-R VS MO
08-Jul-93 21:06:07
Sb: #52346-#CD-R VS MO
Fm: Rich Bowers/OPA 71333,1114
To: MICHAEL KACZMAREK 71722,2054
Michael:
These subjects are covered generally in the CDFAQ file you mentioned. These
are not publishing media (in the sense that they willbe used for general
distribution of data) because 1) MO is read/write, and publishers really like
the read-only format, and 2) lack of standards. For in-house use in data
processing applications, they're fine if you find the system that fits your
needs.
>>HOW CAN I GET MORE INFORMATION ON OPTICAL DISCS (MO) ?<<
MO uses a laser system to change polarity of a heat-sensitive material to
"write" 1's and 0's. They tend to be less data intensive than CDROM but are
relatviely stable and thus better suited to portability and archiving.
>>WHAT IS A WORM DRIVE ?<<
WORM mean "write-once-read-many" and generally refer to a class of technology
that is quite different than CDROM. Make no mistake, there is _nothing_ in the
traditional WORM system that is compatible with CDROM. CD-Recordable and WORM
are quite different in virtually every way. And due to a lack of standards,
the only way to guarantee that the disc you create will be readable elsewhere
is to buy precisely the same hardware in all user locations (and that hardware
tends to be far more expensive that CD).
There are appropriate applications for all three technologies – MO, WORM &
CD-R. CD-R is encroaching on the smaller 5-1/4" format WORM due to its
standards and costs.
Hope this helps.
Best – Rich Bowers