#Nudging the user
17-Jul-93 12:34:45
Sb: #132114-#Nudging the user
Fm: Rich Parker 76556,1132
To: Peter H. Teeson 72647,3674
Peter,
I was obviously oversimplifying the situation, merely to offer a relatively
concise response. Of course, all the elements you mention contribute to the
cost of manufacturing a device. There is also any labor-intensive work, such as
wire bonding (that isn't automated), as well as the cost for testing (which for
complex devices such as CPU chips is a HUGE expense, especially in terms of the
manpower required to write the test programs). The labor costs probably greatly
outweigh the costs of the materials, I'd guess. Then, there is the depreciation
of the capital equipment needed for manufacture, which is nontrivial in
anyone's book.
The result is that if one delves deeply into trying to specify a cost for
manufacture of a given device, it becomes a terribly complex issue. My main
point was that, in general, manufacturing cost is relatively constant (in the
long view) and that manufacturers tend to get most of their profits from a new
device up-front, when it is in great demand and they can charge a premium for
it. The mitigating factors (yield, etc.) have already been covered.
Let's not get too involved in trying to enumerate all of the factors which
influence manufacturing cost. I'm sure that the cost accountants of the
semiconductor industry are making a good living doing just that. 🙂
-rich-