#Art vs Invention
18-Aug-88 02:14:36
Sb: #6624-#Art vs Invention
Fm: Don Curtis/SYSOP 76703,4321
To: Thomas Holaday 70407,534
Tom,
No, I never said that you could contract out 'inspiration'. Certainly
there are so called artists who have great ideas…but no talent to carry that
idea thru to a work of art.
However, what I did say was that no matter how inspired you are, and no
matter how fast it was produced…there is some trial and error that goes into
the product.
You mentioned Harold Robbins. Are you telling me that he (or multiple
'hes') sat at a typewritter, started typing and never went back over the work.
Then took this work and shipped it to a publisher who didn't have it proof-read
and simply had it type-set and printed and distributed?
Of course not, the writter got an idea for a novel, started to put that
idea on paper and in the process read and re-read it and in the process changed
what was originaly put on the paper. They didn't change each and every word,
they may have only changed a few words in the entire novel…but I can almost
guarantee you something was changed from what was first put on the paper.
A ditch is a simple idea, simple to conceptualize and simple to create.
BUT, that also presumes that the person who is to dig the ditch is able to
carry out that task. Give my 2 year old a backhoe and I don't think you'd get
the ditch you conceptualized.
Artistry is much more complex, both in conceptualization and in
creation of the final product. And thus there is a much more limited group of
those able to carry out the task. So limited, that in fact, the person who got
the idea is the probably the only one who could carry out the task, but not
without some trial and error.
Don