#Art vs Invention
18-Aug-88 14:41:33
Sb: #6810-#Art vs Invention
Fm: Don Curtis/SYSOP 76703,4321
To: Thomas Holaday 70407,534
Tom,
No, I didn't miss that, I was merely pointing out that not all persons
are equal at all tasks. If I took a photograph of a scene, composed it in a
method that I thought was inspiring and then gave it to an artist (paint and
brush type) to turn into a painting…I have in fact sub-contracted 'art' in
that my inspiration was turned into reality by someone more skilled than I.
I could sit behind this person and tell him the color wasn't quite
right, or the effect wasn't quite right. I could not create this on my own,
but that doesn't mean I couldn't have someone else do it. I'm NOT saying that
this is normal, or even easy…but it could be done.
Ansel Adams could have had an assistant cart the camera around, told
the assistant how long to make the exposure and where to point the camera. The
assistant could have developed and printed the picture according to strict
instructions from Mr. Adams. None of that means the work was any less Mr.
Adams' work than if he had done it 100% himself. Again, not the normal method
of doing things…but not impossible.
Don