Art vs Invention
18-Aug-88 17:49:28
Sb: #6869-Art vs Invention
Fm: Steve Ahlstrom 76703,2006
To: Thomas Holaday 70407,534
Tom,
"A sentimental or sensitive non-artist could subcontract his painting to
technically proficient soulless dullard without doing serious harm to the
resultant work, because the work is unlikely to be of artistic merit in any
event." Interesting.
Would you consider the Pyramids of Egypt, Great Wall of China, Eiffel Tower,
Golden Gate Bridge, the land paintings of the Mayans, and (almost) endless
other examples to be without "artistic merit"? They were no doubt
"subcontract[ed] … [to] technically proficient soulless dullard[s]".