CompuServe Messages

Art vs Invention

    18-Aug-88 17:49:28
Fm: Steve Ahlstrom 76703,2006
To: Thomas Holaday 70407,534
Tom, "A sentimental or sensitive non-artist could subcontract his painting to technically proficient soulless dullard without doing serious harm to the resultant work, because the work is unlikely to be of artistic merit in any event." Interesting. Would you consider the Pyramids of Egypt, Great Wall of China, Eiffel Tower, Golden Gate Bridge, the land paintings of the Mayans, and (almost) endless other examples to be without "artistic merit"? They were no doubt "subcontract[ed] … [to] technically proficient soulless dullard[s]".