#Out of sequence fossils
20-Aug-94 15:13:18
Sb: #142326-#Out of sequence fossils
Fm: Ed Fisher/PA 72324,264
To: Jim Ferguson 75766,3357
<< Fossils are unlikely to "wash down" to younger layers because the younger
sediments overlay the older ones. Only in an area where a tremendous upheaval
has occurred and inverted the stratigraphy (like the rim rocks around Meteor
Crater, AZ) or where faulting has aligned the sequence of adjacent rocks out of
order would you be able to find older fossils washing down into younger fossil
beds. >>
I guess I didn't make clear my term "washing down". I was attempting to
describe a process in which, for example, fossils from an exposed Pennsylvanian
bed would be freed from the matrix by erosion or solution and re-deposited more
or less intact along with other sediments into a bed of Permian or later age.
I didn't mean "washing down" in the sense of "up" and "down" vertically, but
rather in the sense of older material being eroded and "washing down" as
sediment which would be incorporated into younger beds.
Picture a conglomerate of a given age containing within its pebbly matter
transported fossils from the older eroding highlands.