Earthquake in SE/PA
21-Jan-94 11:22:23
Sb: #118199-Earthquake in SE/PA
Fm: Angus Scott-Fleming 75500,3223
To: Mark E Deardorff 76164,3304
MD> You're right about loans. The government shouldn't be a substitute
MD> for common sense and responsibility. Welfare is the new opiate.
Yeah, and "provide for the general welfare" has been extended to "provide for
individual's welfare" without thinking about where the incentive to provide for
yourself goes when charity becomes a "right".
MD> I don't think you'ld really consider that money worth it considering
MD> the true liklihood of damage exceeding the deductible – they all
MD> exceed $10000. There are a few places where it may have some value
MD> but, in general, it is a low risk, high profit product of the
MD> insurance companies.
Maybe so, but for the Ins.Cos., it's closer to an all-or-nothing situation.
Not like Major Medical insurance, where there will be a certain statistical
number of payouts out of the pool of insured people. When a quake (or other
natural disaster) hits, the entire area has large losses. Witness Hurricane
Andrew in Dade County, Florida. What really frosts _me_ is the Feds going in
and rebuilding Homestead with tax $$$ when it was slated to be closed. Any
business working with money it was responsible for would have seized that
opportunity to walk away instead of sinking $$$ into a wasted cause….but the
Feds don't care about taxpayer pockets, they're infinitely deep <g>.
I carry MM ins, BTW, and pay my own small medical expenses as part of living.
But I don't want to be wiped out in the event of a major medical expense.
Likewise I'd be willing to lose 10k to 20k of my equity in order to pay off the
balance of my loan in the event of a quake. But many people would rather NOT
take responsibility for their decisions (a) in borrowing money for houses; or
(b) in choosing to live in dangerous areas (floodplains, barrier islands,
earthquake-prone areas). Instead they'd rather defer to the banks who loaned
the money to them. On the flip side of this coin IMO any bank which would
permit a mortgagor to borrow without enough insurance is asking for trouble
itself <grin> so maybe Chapter 7 isn't such a Bad Thing for people who borrowed
from such banks – the banks will pay for _their_ poor judgment.
Yours in freedom,
-=< Angus Scott-Fleming >=-
GeoApplications
Tucson, Arizona
* TANSTAAFL * I'd rather be dead than domesticated. Poul Andersen