CompuServe Messages

Forth vs C

    14-Sep-88 17:54:42
Sb: #3718-Forth vs C
Fm: DAN WISEHART 72677,3223
To: William Volk 73007,2376
I am really glad to hear that you have so much experience with Forth. I can understnad how the lack of standard IO made you turn away from Forth to C. Forth is still in its infancy and the standards are not YET there. I hope to change that. That is partially why I started this discussion. When more than one company supports a more complete Forth, I really think you will see alot more development done in the language. Which brings me to the question, "would you be willing to disclose the name and address of your friend on the IEEE Forth standard's committee?" I would like to whisper a few things in that body's ears. If not, is there a way for the common man to bring up suggestions to that committee? Double precision (64 bit) fixed point operators is one thing that MF doesn't have on the Amiga that I am working on right now. This will increase your dynamic range from 4.295 E+09 to 1.845 E+19. That's ten billion times the resolution. This task should not be any more difficult (or slow) than doing 16 bit fixed point Forth on 8 bit machines that don't have "word" operators. This still doesn't take care of your need for multiple compilers. Interestingly, the "to be completed next year" program that I have only started on is a CAD program in Forth. I own Aegis Draw Plus, but it is too buggy for the work I am involved with. Perhaps I expected too much, but I am trying to use it in an industrial control market where I currently have some two to three hundred prints that I (and coworkers) need to store and keep updated. I have dug in and refused to buy an I*M and AutoCAD (nice), so I must now work on my own CAD program. I hope that I haven't bitten off more than I can chew! Before I give up on Draw+, I bought my copy in November of '87. Have there been any real additions (even bug squashes) since then? Thank you for all of your comments. Those of us that are sticking with the language (fanatics, if you will) hope to make the compiler and standards people catch up to what are needs are real soon now. It won't happen tommorow, but we keep at it. I hope, when that day comes, you'll come back and Forth with us.