#WUTIL and MS-DOS 3.10
23-Aug-90 21:32:56
Sb: #21307-#WUTIL and MS-DOS 3.10
Fm: Bill Mayhew [VAX/DECPC] 76702,502
To: William Lee Roberts 76675,365
Will,
First off… long time no see! Where the heck are you these days??!
I agree, that's an interesting idea. The question is, do you think any
industry association would be willing to go for it? Particularly if the
responsibility extends to making the code available to all registered end
users, the cost of administering the escrow agreement is high. An
agreement to make it available to another supporting entity is reasonable,
though… bearing in mind the legal issue I raised which makes the whole
software-escrow arrangement less secure than it might appear.
How does one identify the alternate supporting entity, though? Is the
industry association capable of doing so (probably not unless they have
some technical staff of their own capable of doing the evaluation)? Is the
original vendor responsible for that? Does it just go up to the highest
bidder when the time comes (which could be a competitor who simply wants to
buy the product and shove it in a safe, "forcing" customers to switch to a
different product over time)?
-Bill