CompuServe Messages

No need to rein in the expression of your philosophical underpinnings regarding architecture. Your 'real architecture and CAD' thesis is probably more appropriate in a place like the LEAP Forum's Architecture section, though, than in a thread that started as a question about a specific piece of software. I wouldn't charecterize your "philosophy" of architecture as arrogant, just the way (I perceived) that you expressed it. And as is always the case, my perceptions, and responses to them, may have more to do with me than with what you actually typed… Your "philosophy" itself, that appears to revolve around the notion that the highest value of architecture is achieved if it's 'published', seems more just misguided and immature, to me. I think there's more to it than that… But then, you might charecterize me as just an old fogey, too. <bg> Fair enough…