#Digitizer Advice
27-Sep-90 14:37:40
Sb: #864-#Digitizer Advice
Fm: Bill Eastburn 70007,1657
To: Stephen Marano 72415,1507
You are talking apples and oranges when comparing Digi-View to
FrameGrabber. Digi-View is basically a static image, slow scan digitizer.
FrameGrabber is a near real time color capture system. DigiView can
capture images from a VCR, but only in B&W, only if the image is stable for
a relatively long period of time, and, as I recall, only at 320×200
resolution. FrameGrabber captures in approximately 1/60 second and in
color, as I recall.
From my point of view, the images captured by FrameGrabber fall short of
the quality I would want. The captured images done with Impulse's VD-1
(approx. $1000) seem far superior to me. Never having seen images from
NewTek's Video Toaster (maybe to be released some day) or Impulse's
Firecracker24, I can't compare them. The latter two are over $1000 systems
in any event. There is a limitation imposed on resolution for all frame
grabbers imposed by NTSC broadcast standards/state-of-the-art.
Cheaper than FrameGrabber? Hmmm. There is a system called Live! by A
Squared. (Unsure of pricing.) The colors tend to seem terribly artificial
to me. I can't think of any other alternatives off the top of my head.
There used to be images created by Live!, VD-1, and Framegrabber up in
the libraries. Since the split of the forums, I'm not sure whether they
still are there or not. I don't recall any captured images done by
DigiView. If they still exist, you can download them and compare the
quality for yourself.
Maybe someone else will jump in and be of more assistance.
Bill, K3OZM