#Diamond Viper
04-Sep-93 13:53:23
Sb: #56139-#Diamond Viper
Fm: James M. Murphy 71165,1321
To: Evan Yares [WeirdTM] 75300,1771
Evan,
>>> Most of the programs you mention are bound by the time it takes to send
large blocks of pixels to the graphics card. A local bus ET4000 will be as
fast or faster at this than most high priced accelerators.
Basically, if a card will run FLC files fast, it'll run 24 bit Windows
programs fast. The more expensive cards add improved window and font
manipulation, as well as vector drawing. <<<
Thanks Evan…Actually I didn't realize this. I guess I'm gonna have to
have a long talk with the MGA side of the business so that I better
understand the advantages of the MGA card. Actually I did all my research
on the Illuminator Pro side of the equation and just assumed that the
companion card would be the best fit. I never really researched it further
than that. Verrry Interesting.
So what your saying is…a local Bus ET-40000 is just as fast as the MGA
Power Graphics Card and it is capable of delivering true color, real-time
3D 64-bit wide graphics?
Accourding to the MGA Liturature the MGA utilizes a 64-bit wide graphics
memory bus and takes advantage of what they refer to as "advanced VRAM
"block-write" features. This allows MGA to process graphics data up to 12
times the speed of even the best graphics chips from ATI, S3 and Weitek! (
I'm quoting the Lit. here. )
It's even mentioned that the MGA supports 24-bit DOS applications like 3D
Studio.
However if I understand this correctly you're saying there is no
difference between the MGA 64-bit card and any Local bus ET4000?
I'm Confused!
Since I happen to have received a new 486DX2-66MHz with a Local Bus
Video-ET 4000 and I will be receiveing the MGA local bus card in about a
week what would you suggest as a good test to check out the real
differences?
As a dealer it wouldn't make sense for me to be promoting a card that's
almost $1,000.00 more than necessary for the client to get the maximum out
of his workstation.
I find it hard to beleive that Matrox would put a card out on the market
that's $1,000.00 more than what is currently doing the "same job".
What other cards have features like DynaView and real-time 3D rendering,
Gouraud shading and even Phong lighting for AutoCAD?
I thought 60k Gouraud shaded z-buffered triangles per second was a hell of
a specification! Of course now were getting in to vector drawing though.
Hmmmm I think I'm begining to sort some of this out.
Anyone care to clarify this in a more consise manner for me before I ramble
on much more?
Thanks Evan…this is helping to clarify my thinking about some of the
features on the MGA series.
James M. Murphy