CompuServe Messages

To be honest, I am tired about the "wait and see" attitude <g> Not that I want everybody to jump into OS/2. I am concious about my 3DS dependency, like all people here, so if OS/2 3.0 doesn't do 3DS, I am not going to go OS/2. However, if you can run your apps and peripherals under a new system with a great architecture, then you are mad not to switch to it. IMHO, people are willing to jump from the MS/Intel bandwagon, but they are going to do it only if there is something better than the thing they already have. People should take in count that OS/2 3.0 is the THIRD version of a stable solid operating system, while Windows NT 3.0 is the FIRST version of a totally new operating system, and 3.5 is in fact just v1.5. Chicago (now delayed to mid-1995) is a remake of an old terror cheesy movie with 32bit parts. It is going to be called Windows 4, but it should be called Chicago 1.0. So what we should get? ahh, I don't know <g> Seriously, if OS/2 3.0 really do what it is said, we will buy OS/2 for our Intel machines. For future machines… well, none of them will have an Intel processor, so who cares? <bg> ana /krazy images