Architectural visualiz.
13-Sep-94 17:41:52
Sb: #123521-Architectural visualiz.
Fm: Steven Elliott 70303,1363
To: Paul Sanford [LVL5] 75144,2354
Hi Paul,
Architects are such cheapskates aren't they?
If these firms tried to hire a traditional illustration firm, they'd
be spending that $300-$1200 budget on a single marker rendering
(probably much more). Of course since you're using a computer it's no
work at all and so it should be cheaper, right? <BG>
Even if the firm tried to have one of their senior production staff
whip up a marker rendering, it would easily take a full day and
assuming a billable rate for the employee of $45/hr you're still
talking $360 for a single image. You will probably have the most
marketing success by pointing out that you can create a much higher
quality 3D model for the price of a few traditional marker
renderings, and that the more views they need of the model the
cheaper the per image cost becomes.
While billing by finished second of animation is common in the
broadcast world, architects and engineers are much more comfortable
with the concept of an hourly rate for service provided. What is
important is that, regardless of the billing method, you ensure that
you are sufficiently compensated for your work. Just for comparison,
a survey of architectural billing rates shows that your $30-$40 per
hour rate is equal to the average billable rate for intermediate
drafters. IOW, you are equating your skills with 3D Studio and
animation with the value of someone drafting sections and details.
Good Luck,
Steven
P.S. I'm glad you liked the book, thanks!