CompuServe Messages

Whose facts Evan, Chris's, whom I also acknowledge as an expert in his field, or PC Magazine's facts or Marion's interpretation of the facts? I used the word opinion to imply each persons "facts". Opinions, in theory, are based on fact. I have read more than a few articles which while factual, left out important details which created an erroneous conclusion on the part of the reader. Maybe Marion has been sloppy with his details, but on the other hand it is possible that he believes he is being factual based on what he has read. I get your point, but it implies that my statement should have read "I think everyone should be able to express their own facts", which is a contradiction to the meaning of the word. And I did say that I thought the facts should stand for themselves. And while we're on the subject of facts maybe you'd be willing to clarify a point if you know the "facts". In a networking environment with file transfers and disk access etc. which is going to manage the traffic faster a 386/40 or a 486/33 all else being equal? (No applications running in the background, same drives RAM etc. ) I'm very interested to hear your answer especially as you place such high regard for the facts. <g>