#MSVC++ 2.2 ?!?!
28-Aug-95 13:10:11
Sb: #187261-#MSVC++ 2.2 ?!?!
Fm: Mike Kelley 71302,73
To: albert waltner 70137,2777
> If you intended to say that someone CAN write a DLL with Visual Basic, that
is not true
Well, it's not *strictly* true, but it is true. Using a product called Visual
DLL (around $250) you can create DLLs with VB.
However, the basic question posed by Peter is certainly valid — can MAX use
DLLs and, if so, why would it care what produced them? If it's a question as
to whether they make appropriate 32bit calls, that is different than stating
categorically that only Visual C++ 2.2 can do it.