CompuServe Messages

#Windows 95 Intro

    12-Sep-95 19:55:21
Sb: #122200-#Windows 95 Intro
Fm: RAD Moose @ NewTek, Inc. 76004,3350
To: J Saperstein/FontBank 75300,632
>I've always refrained from discussing our business relationship here since >it really wasn't anybody else's concern but ours. I feel exactly the same way, Jerry. I am just responding to your various references to "sitting with Jenison and two lawyers" and promising this and that, the implication being that I have somehow reneged or misrepresented something, in the context of our business relationship. Believe me I wouldn't have brought it up otherwise. >NewTek negotiated an agreement to license the FontBank product in exchange >for a "high-end" video editing system including the Video Toaster. I was not personally involved in any of thoses negotiations, Jerry. I did sign the resulting contract, which specified what you were to receive. We delivered those things and a lot more. >>> I think any reasonable person would conclude that you got one hell of a >>>bargain, a truly special deal. >>> Unfortunately, I don't think I did. Well, I guess it stands to reason that if you think I got too good a deal, you must have gotten the short end of the stick. I'm sorry you feel that way, and I don't agree, but I don't think anyone forced you to make the deal. >The original system supplied was anything but "high-end" and I've got the >expert opinions supporting that contention. That's why folks put things in writing. You did, and I sent you everything on the list. >All I've ever wanted in exchange for the license was a system on which I >could cut action, matching movements to the exact frame. Use whatever term you >want to describe the process, but I don't think there can be any >misunderstanding as to intent. On the contrary, a misunderstanding is exactly what we have had. > Indeed it was my example – and I'd like to see you do it on the Flyer in one >try. Where exactly do you predict I will run into difficulty? .. given your example… > Call that feature whatever you want to: without it, you can't seriously cut >action or match frames on the Flyer without engaging in a "trial-and-error" >process. "Tail on preview" is an excellent addition to the Flyer, and you should find it useful. However, editing, even with this feature, is inherently a trial and error process. Upon previewing an edit, many times you will make adjustments. Seeing the tail doesn't tell exactly how the edit will look and feel. Fortunately with a non-linear system, previewing edits is much quicker than with tape editing. And. of course, once you are happy with the edit, you're done. You don't have to wait for the edit controller and tape machines to actually perform the edit. > Believe it or not, Tim, I am a major big time NewTek supporter. I think the >Video Toaster is the cat's meow and that the Flyer definitely has potential. Jerry, I am reading a log of your past messages, and whether you are aware of it or not, they come off as very antagonistic. They impugn my ethics and disparage our efforts to improve our products. We don't deserve this. > By the same token, I feel that I gave NewTek an incredibly sweet deal when >licensing our fonts – and I don't feel that spirit has been fully reciprocated >- and I am just plain tired of waiting. Well, I must admit my spirit was a little dampened by all the legal and travel expenses I incurred, but, goldarn it, I just LIKE you, ya old galoot! Again, I gave you a Flyer to make you happy. Give me a chance to get you going. I honestly think it's the best NLE system for your needs. Bugs? Yes. Ideosyncrasies? Yeah. Improving dramatically? You better believe it! your friend Tim