ARexx…Where Are Ports?
06-Oct-89 11:28:11
Sb: #68448-ARexx…Where Are Ports?
Fm: Art Steinmetz 76044,3204
To: Will Estes 74776,3676
I use AREXX all the time, as do many others here. I think the majority of
folks use it more as a superdooper script language or a macro language for just
one program. The IPC aspects have not been fully exploited.
I have made some minor forays into IPC. I have one invocation of TxEd
controlling another is a Whap-like thingy for other BBS's. Same thing for the
M2Sprint Modula 2 editor running a context sensitive online reference. I have
Microfiche Filer and DOS working together a lot (does that count?).
You do not need AREXX to conform and use the AREXX standard of IPC in your
programs. You could use it privately between your applications.
In what I consider to be a bizarre move, Mindware plans to release a version of
PageRender3D with NO user interface, just an AREXX port. Another Mindware
product, TASS (a hypercard-y thing for AREXX), can optionally be used to "roll
your own" interface – or not.
Good AREXX interfaces. If you can do *everything* with AREXX you can do with a
mouse and keyboard the AREXX interface is perfect, most programs need some
work. Of the programs I've seen TxEd+, WShell and Digipaint3 come closest to
that ideal. Microfiche Filer+ is good. The M2Sprint Editor is good. VLT is
poor (otherwise outstanding comm program). I can't comment on others. — Art