#Using Type
03-Oct-89 11:00:10
Sb: #13224-#Using Type
Fm: Kathleen Tinkel 72426,1056
To: Scott Aronian 71536,751
Ooof. Just looking at that page (p. 27 in the October MacUser) makes me want
to pounce. But I can (probably) restrain myself from asking too many
penetrating questions about the unfocused layout to comment as requested on the
first paragraph.
Monday-morning quarterbacking is easy, of course, but I think that first
paragraph would appear awkward to any reader. I would like to see the type
contoured against the side of the dropped A, especially since not doing so
created an awkward widow (the word 'sizes.' under the cap). Fitting the type
next to the cap would make the text read better. However, it is not MacUser
style to contour initial caps, and there are good reasons to stand by the style
book. Furthermore, it's a little old-fashioned to fit type around ornamental
letters, and many, many good-looking publications don't do it, including The
New York Times Magazine. Contouring is by no means required.
However, I think they were duty-bound to do something about the widow. Several
solutions come to mind. The easiest approach would be to change the word
'retailers' in line 5 to 'dealers'; then, with any luck, 'sizes' would wrap up
to end the line. If that didn't work, they could cheat the gutter between the
A and the text by 3 or 4 points. They could have considered merging the first
two paragraphs. Or they might have had to rewrite the first paragraph to add
enough text to run over at least three-quarters of the measure to support the
drop cap.
And thanks for the kind words. There would be more room for illustration, they
tell me, if I would write shorter.
And what did you think about the MacUser paragraph, anyway?