Dr.T's Level 2 & DTP
10-Oct-89 02:34:48
Sb: #23104-Dr.T's Level 2 & DTP
Fm: Dominick J. Fontana 74766,2154
To: Allen Mitts 75216,1236
Allen,
I own KCS-Level II, M, and Music-X. As mentioned, I don't like the KCS
interface. With time at a premium, I am trying to select the best music
software for my needs. I spent a number of months with KCS and it got the job
done. However, rather than spread my time between too many different programs,
I would rather use just a few programs and master them. When Music-X was
finally released, I decided to devote all my time to learning it. In theory, I
thought I might use both programs (Music-X & KCS) at different times for their
different strengths. I then decided to stick with MX for now. I discovered that
most complex programs, and especially KCS, remain very difficult to use if you
don't use them constantly. KCS isn't really Amiga-specific and MX is. In that
vein, I'll probably exclusively use MX for sequencing, for now, and wait to see
what they do with the new KCS release (with menus and graphic editing). I'll
reevaluate it at that time. I'll also use M for algorithmic composing instead
of the PVG in KCS. In this way I can really master these two programs.
As for MX improvements over KCS, besides keyboard mapping, the bar
editor, and librarian, MX also has an excellent filters page that also offers
real time Midi control; a much better Samples page with an amplitude envelope;
and also allows for patch editing from the librarian page. In addition, it has
an open-ended architecture for protocols and additional modules, and generally
has a much superior interface. Both the graphic and event editing are a
pleasure to use and the sequencer page has fast forward, rewind buttons, and
more cue points. The edit windows scroll on playback and events appear in real
time in the edit windows as you record them. The program is Amiga-specific and
just more user-friendly and fun to use.
My MX complaints: more comprehensive editing, especially for global
edits; a real metronome function within the program; real time quantizing; a
better step recording method; printing, a notepad & calculator; and more
protocols.
With all that said, I just ordered MasterTracks Pro 3.5. I'm never
satisfied.
Dom Fontana