#Open Letter to CBM
10-Oct-91 20:07:35
Sb: #15257-#Open Letter to CBM
Fm: Mark D. Manes 74030,744
To: Harold W. Grigdesby 76304,3030
Part of my problem with NeXT is that it does not exactly deliver what I
consider exciting about computing. Hardware-wise it does not really
represent anything new. Yes, it has a DSP chip and all of that, but is
that really exciting? useful? The most innovative thing about it is the
interface and that is only 'remotely' interesting considering the amount of
cpu horsepower required to fly it.
Most UNIX gurus for some reason do not much like the Mach kernel, though I
am not actually sure why. I think that it is because it is 'differenet'
from what they know and love.
What I find exciting are machiens that provide a high performance for least
amount of dollar. Today, INHO, Commodore is the only company providing
the kind of ratio that satisfies me. The fact that I have an Amiga 3000
with 5 megabytes of memory and an OS that provides me with an
workstation-like environment without the hangups of workstations (namely
UNIX… :-)) excites me no end.
NeXT has put its dollars into bringing business software on to their
machine. It is an expensive gamble on the part of NeXT. I believe
Commodore does this as well, just not at the same scale, and for various
reasons. The first being is that they don't have to. They always can
decide to package an A500 and a joystick and be the Toys R US of computers.
NeXT does not have that luxury.
Further, considering the Apple heritage that Steven Jobs carries with him
gives me even more reason not to like the NeXT. The latter of course is
very judgemental on my part and is based on his 'efforts' at Apple.
-mark=
– via the Whapster!