Open Letter to CBM
12-Oct-91 02:02:14
Sb: #15356-Open Letter to CBM
Fm: Don Curtis/SYSOP 76703,4321
To: Harold W. Grigdesby 76304,3030
Hal,
Sure…ABI compliance is a major plus. It allows an ABI program
written for ANY 68xxx SVR4 machine to run on any other 68xxx SVR4 machine
AS IS. In other words, true shrink-wrap software for UNIX.
As to why the 3000's UNIX (it's not called AMIX any more…or last
I heard, it wasn't called AMIX any more) wasn't fully optimized for the
hardware. I *suspect* there's multiple reasons. A. It was a first
version, thus the idea would be to get it running, then find the weak
points and optimize in a later version. That's NOT to say there weren't
some optimizations…but it's obvious it wasn't fully optimized…else why
would the 2.0 version of UNIX run faster? B. SVR4 itself was in flux. My
memory is that it was November of 90 when UNIX, Int'l made their first
release of code available. C. The quality of the assemblers, compilers
wasn't as good. D. Hand optimization takes a long time (relatively), thus
early versions may have been optimized by the compiler/assembler while
later versions may have been hand optimized.
The above is all GUESSES, I have/had no special knowledge of what
went on inside Commodore.
Don
p.s. BTW…beta versions of SVR4 were available before Nov of 90, but the
final version wasn't available from UNIX Int'l until then. Again..that's
my memory, I could be wrong.