#A3000 vs MAC
25-Oct-92 16:29:31
Sb: #74513-#A3000 vs MAC
Fm: Richard S. Rose,M.D. 73106,1560
To: John Leonard 100015,251
John,
We accept files from just about any source for imagesetter output.
Natuarally 95 % of the stuff we get is from Macs. There is a commonly held
mistaken idea that the PostScript output from Macs is relatively
trouble-free and that it outputs without difficulty. Nothing could be
further from the truth. It _is_ true that the programs themselves on the
Mac as the 'front end' of a process for generating a page of typesetting
and graphics are superior (more polished, more features) to those on Amiga.
However, the PostScript output from the major Amiga programs (Pagestream,
ProPage, ProDraw) is clean and a joy to output. It is _fast_ and appears to
respect the PostScript environment in the imagesetter much better than Mac
programs (it follows the rules).
I agree that someone who has little computer experience should be steered
toward the Mac as a first choice if it is graphic arts work that they want
to do. But, if the Amiga _is_ used, it's output can be sent to just about
any service bureau with a great deal of confidence that it will be accepted
and that the results will be as desired.
I can give anyone who is working on the Amiga brief instructions on how to
give files to a Mac-oriented bureau. If the file consists mainly of
typography, there will be virtually no problems whatsoever. There _is_ a
problem in the case of files that have large included graphics, but these
can be overcome also.
It has been my experience that once the Amiga operator gains a little
experience in preparing files for output, the service bureau will respond
that those files are among the most trouble-free in its operation.
Rich