CompuServe Messages

#Which deck is better

    30-Sep-93 03:04:43
Fm: James M. Murphy 71165,1321
To: Ana Francisca Gervas 70624,673
>> "the Matrox 1024" << Again this is NOT an Illuminator Pro Card….. I hate to keep bringing this up but All horses are animals but not all animals are horses. _____It's a different Card and A different Division_____. The Illuminator Pro Cards is in what one could consider the Professional Products Division. This is like me picking on the Targa 16 boards….gimme a break!<g> Being a heavy supporter of Truevision you should know that the people in "Professional" Divisions have nothing to do with "Consumer" class equipment. <g> I'm not even sure that the 1024 is a very new technology. It doesn't even interest me as a dealer. Speaking of which…I am a NEW dealer for the Matrox Illuminator Pro card which is authorized directly through Matrox and DOES NOT GO THROUGH DISRIBUTION…..like your Truevision cards… so I am expected to really do my homework on the Illuminator Pro. Therefore I'm got my hands full what with putting in invisible net and just receiving my copy or Release 3 3D Studio (Dealer Version Please don't anyone get excited yet<g>) Plus testing the Sanyo GVR-S950. The 1024 is low on my list of things to find out about. Maybe you could explain to me why you wouldn't rather be looking at the MGA card or the Illuminator Pro cards for a "Review". I find it somewhat curious. Also I got the impression that you were MAJOR truevision dealers/supporters….isn't that kind of like asking the Pope to do a review on Judisim? <BG> LaTER. James M. Murphy