CompuServe Messages

Sanyo GVR-S950

    15-Oct-93 02:34:06
Sb: #66143-Sanyo GVR-S950
Fm: Wayne Cole 76370,621
To: Fred Berney 71020,1207
I've been using a JVC BR-S822 and PSFC for animation for quite some time with none of the head problems mentioned. In fact, I took it to JVC for a ROM change a while back and asked them to check heads and alignment etc and they said it was all in tip-top shape. I've experienced none of the horror stories related here by others re excessive head wear. In fact, many of the video people I talk with are not as concerned with head wear from animation as they are with "mechanism banging". (I render frames uncompressed to disk or removable media, then singleframe the pre-rendered frames to tape as that saves a little wear and tear on the tape handling mechanisms.) I think that head wear is only a function of the number of hours that tape drags over the heads. I don't think it matters whether it is done during single-framing or during regular editing. PAR uses JPEG, I think. The degree of compression required for 30 fps probably depends on the complexity of the image, so the more complex the image, the more loss will occur. (JPEG is a "lossy" technique). You may not see it on the master, but if you have to go a generation or two down for the "final-final" it may be real noticable. PAR boasts Y/C out and compnenent out. There are other (cheaper) ways to get that, even from the Toaster. DPS PCA, Y/C Plus, Nova's Y/C++, et al. And this output will not "make up for" any losses due to JPEG. And eventually you have to get it off the PAR to tape anyway unless it is for you own personal viewing anyway. You may also want to think about what other video needs you have. If editing is in your plans, PAR may take needed $ away from stuff more suited to direct support of the editing process. Your animation may be the least of your video chores, in which case you be better off with a good editing deck and feeder(s). OTOH, if all you do is animation and someone else lays it to tape, but you need to have preview capability or "draft" version to low end tape cabability, PAR may make sense. And, if you have no intention of going to tape and just want to be able to view animations in real-time, PAR is prbably your best bet. PAR with the non-included HD will set you back about what the deck you are considering will. Do you already have a deck that you can record from PAR with? (rhetorical). Just some points to ponder that really have to be answered by you on the basis of a) how much you have to spend and b) what kind of quality out MUST you have (as opposed to WANT – as in BetaCam/D1/D3….;^}