#Suicide as an option <g>
22-Oct-93 11:17:54
Sb: #62743-#Suicide as an option <g>
Fm: David Somers 71360,124
To: John Ellis 72440,3046
Sorry for the confusion <G>
On a non dedicated server your machine is doing double duty. It is
the server, and at the same time it is someones workstation. If the
application they are running crashes so badly that you have to reset
the computer to recover (as opposed to just using <CTRL><ALT><DEL>)
then you are rebooting your server too, much to the annoyance of your
other users. With a dedicated server your machine is only doing one
thing, being a file server. The likelyhood of having to reboot it is
less than if it were non dedicated.
In a small operation a non dedicated server may not be much of a risk.
You need to look at how your users function and how critical their
work is and then decide if the cost savings of using a non dedicated
server (you save the price of one machine) is worth the possibility
of having your non dedicated server lock up and need to be reset
while there are active files open.
This is not that big a disaster. Network operating systems are
pretty flexible, expecially the peer to peers. If an application on
a non dedicated peer to peer server hangs you can usually just walk
around the office and ask folks to save their work and log off, then
go reset the server. The server software and the local application
are running in different virtual machines. Having one lock usually
doesn't affect the other. Because of the size of our network and the
type of applications I feel much safer with a dedicated server.