Miro v. Fast vs. Videola
12-Jan-95 19:10:51
Sb: #292-Miro v. Fast vs. Videola
Fm: Wit Cieslik 100352,2743
To: David E. Rosenstein 75060,522
Hi David,
I too have been looking at low end DTV products for some time, and I too have
come to
a tossup between FAST and Miro.
I was demoed the FAST product by the distrubuter here in Australia and the demo
dod not go well.
Also the image quality was not what I expected.
About a month ago I went to the distrubutor here for Miro and had a good play
of their system.
On the whole the output quality of the miro was far better. (Also the demo ran
smooth as silk, which
was pretty convincing since it was my video footage we were playing with.).
One notecable 'funny' was that the scene we digitised and re-recorded (skiier
skiing), although the main action looked OK, the background (trees and bushes)
seemed to strobe as they panned past.
New Media (Nov I think) has a test of about a dozen capture cards and both FAST
and Miro rate the best.
Since then a frien of mine purchased the FAST board and I have used it to frame
grab, but again I was not real happy with the result.
VGA overlay …. Fast YES Miro NO …
YC input …….. Fast NO Miro Yes
TBC Fast Yes Miro No … I metnion this cause with the TBC
off it would not sync to my
camera at all (Cannon UC10).
I have arranged a second trial of the Miro and this time I will use my own
camera as the source.
I am really swayed to the Miro product. (from the FAST demos I've seen, the
fast works best with
small windows wheras the Miro has little or no problem with full screen).
Regards,
Wit C.