#new PAR.EXE
08-Oct-94 01:09:38
Sb: #127644-#new PAR.EXE
Fm: Brick Eksten 74041,2043
To: John K. Jordan 71174,711
To be honest, I am really against supporting jpeg as an output format… I
don't mean like cross my arms, and stamp my foot against it, but well, kinda
like… Ahhh MAAANN… JPEG?… REALLY?… To me it seems you always want to
keep the image in the RGB or uncompressed domain, especially for things like
compositing, esp when working with alpha channels. Having just one set of jpeg
algorithms wandering through the image is one thing, but when you add the
second layer of another jpeg algorithm on top of it, the chances of rapidly
increasing artifacting get better and better. We have tried MANY generations
of importing and exporting from the PAR without noticeable effect. Not so with
some of the JPEG software I have seen which butchers the image in only a few
generations.. All this doesn't mean that we will never support jpeg, we
probably will soon enough, but *I* won't use it…
Brick