Bang Bang
07-Oct-94 00:16:59
Sb: #166510-Bang Bang
Fm: Karl F. Kugel 72467,2474
To: Don Curtis/SYSOP 76703,4321
Don, Don, the Supreme Court HASN'T said much one way or another, other
than dicta indicating that firearm ownership is an individual right.
Failure to review lower court cases is not the same as a statement by the
Supreme Court, whatever you may believe. The LAST major Supreme Court
case on gun control, US vs Miller from 1939 (and the only 20th century
case to reach the Supreme Court), upheld the taxing and registration of
destructive devices (machine guns, sawed-off shotguns, ect.) *since there
had been no contrary evidence presented at trial or on appeal*. The
constitutionality of the statute hadn't even been argued. So anyone who
tells you that gun control has been endorsed by the Supreme Court is
simply indulging in wishful thinking. There are two 19th Century cases
upholding some *State* level regulation, but there is NOTHING that comes
even close to endorsing anything like a federal "assault weapon" ban like
that which was just passed. There is good reason to think those 19th
century cases would be decided differently today as well.
-Karl