#Miro v. Fast vs. Videola
13-Jan-95 15:18:00
Sb: #1917-#Miro v. Fast vs. Videola
Fm: Steve Bennett/SYSOP 76702,1071
To: Marc Reinig 72410,77
Marco,
I will try to answer some of your questions, too.
YC Input means that the board will except a video signal that has the
Luminance (brightness) portion seperated from the Chrominance) or color.
This results in a higher quality video input and output as when the two,
Luminance and Chrominance are combined in one signal (Composite), they
tend to mix together and cause cross-colors (rainbox like-patterns in
images containing checkered or stripe patterns) and dot-crawl (dots
aligning the borders of colors).
TBCs or Time Base Correctors correct timing irregularities that occur
during VCR playback.
I believe that both the FAST and Miro products use the M-JPEG compression
formats although there are utilities available to convert M-JPEG to MPEG,
etc.
Disk Drive speed is pretty important with these devices, especially if you
want to upgrade in the future. If you can afford "A/V" class drives that
typically range in size from 1-10GBs, that would be the way to go.
However, any drive that can push through 700Kb/sec (which is most of them
today, as far as I know) should work fine.
Changing, complex images are hardest on the video capture devices, and
yes, I would expect that they would not look as good.
The FAST with the M-JPEG option board can be bundled with Adobe Premiere
v1.1. The Miro board comes with Ulead's Media Studio software, I think.
-John