Tape Calculator
27-Sep-94 10:11:03
Sb: #47078-Tape Calculator
Fm: David Hofberg 73374,776
To: John Strakele 71031,1370
John
A quick update on Calculator. Calculator reuires the following elements to
run:
DTSCUSTOM.DLL, OKNA.DLL and OKNAINTL.DLL must be in the same directory as
TAPECALC.EXE, and WIN.INI must contain a section and line (such as [DeskTop
Set] plus Data=C:\WINDOWS\DESKTOP) pointing to where CALC.OPT is stored and
where LAST.TAP is or will be stored.
TAPECALC.EXE is clearly the program itself, and LAST.TAP is the last session,
if saved. CALC.OPT contains the interface elements established by
File/Setup…, etc. DTSCUSTOM.DLL appears to contain only the pointing finger,
insofar as it relates to Calculator, although that is duplicated in
TAPECALC.EXE. OKNA.DLL contains a great variety of elements, such as the
dialog boxes used by Calculator to say that printing has been started, is being
abandoned, etc., (these dialog boxes are used by all the modules) plus 'string
tables' (although none seem to relate to Calculator), and the hammer icon.
OKNAINTL.DLL seems to related only to Calendar, dates and names of days.
That's a long way of saying, I don't think there is a print configuration
option for Calculator. Your memory of speaking to Konstantin is probably
correct: that what is printed is simply a text dump, and that the configuration
has to be done at the printer. For what it's worth, my HP Series II with
Windows Printing System prints correctly in portrait orientation.
I remember Konstantin commenting publicly some time ago that the frustration
with developing and supporting Calculator is that HP puts out top of the line
calculator products for $50 RRP. For 'advanced' number crunchers, that's
obviously the way to go; for infrequent 1+1=?-types, Windows' Calculator is
probably satisfactory. But then there are users like yourself or myself, who
require more than one but less than the other. I'm sorry you've got stuck in
the middle; personally (and I hope I don't hurt any feelings) I never liked
DTS' Calculator. I thought it was a little guady looking and a little
inflexible. I think Norton's product is much better, and fulfills my needs
exactly.
I'm sorry I can't be of more help on this. If you have any programming
ability, I hope you will seriously consider my previous suggestion of
'acquiring' Calculator, although I honestly have no idea how such a suggestion
would be received (I'm married to an attorney, so I assume everything is
negotiable, particularly if it no longer has 'value' to the owner).
Good luck, and perhaps more info will be forthcoming from Konstantin, either
when one of the Okna folk speak to him, or when he returns.
David