#Pushing OS/2
15-Oct-94 22:06:11
Sb: #167983-#Pushing OS/2
Fm: Eulogio (DJ) Garcia 74471,23
To: Richard S. Rose,M.D. 73106,1560
Oh, well, Rich, I guess we have different ideas on what obsolete means
<g>. I view an A4000/040 with 18MB memory, a Picasso graphics board and a
nice 17" monitor as an ideal personal desktop, superior to a similar
486DX2 even at 66MHz. Neither is suitable for HEAVY commercial use such
as you need, yet both are mainstream systems in their respective camps for
personal power users. You need a Hummer, while I'm looking for something
like a Mustang Cobra <g>.
It appears to me you're talking horsepower, and I'm talking handling and
cornering. The personal desktop better than WB 3.1 on the Amiga hardware
architecture has yet to appear. Using RISC gets you horsepower, but
they're still using mediocre desktop software and the prevalent platform
(Windows/Intel) just doesn't cut it. And I find the Mac OS environment
too restrictive and inflexible, and it still can't multitask properly,
something I do constantly. But if you're always in one app, I guess you
wouldn't have much need for it. We have different needs, is all.
For servers, no contest. NT and OS/2 have server-oriented aspects
AmigaDOS doen't address, nor was designed for. But for a desktop I find
OS/2 too bloated. It does have some nice stuff, though.
And for applications, yes, there are killer specialized and general
consumption apps under Windows that I wish I had in my Amiga. But these
are not the platform per se.
In all, I find obsolete the wrong term. Unsuitable for some stuff and
many people, absolutely.
But, no problemo. One of the great things in life is to experience
different opinions and enjoy them and learn from them another perspective.
Enjoy your favorite platform!
DJ
On AP from Queens, the thrill and excitement of the Big Apple
Where a little paranoia keeps you healthy and sane …