#Win95 vs WinNT
07-Oct-95 15:16:40
Sb: #194380-#Win95 vs WinNT
Fm: Eric C. Peterson 74461,157
To: David Gould 100424,2533
Greetings!
You raise valid points. I have just learned in the past two days that Win95
and WinNT are at least supposed to support the same code, with WinNT being the
more powerful for supporting multithreaded apps. Thus, what you say makes
sense. Perhaps we've been blinded by the marketing hype aimed at the great
unwashed masses, and simply haven't had the opportunity to (or the inclination
to) examine (or to be told about) the potential for a greater unified
upgrade/capability plan. I'd be curious if your opinions derive from (a)
first-hand knowledge, (b) an astute analysis of technical information and
marketing plans either unavailable to the greater number of users or not really
compiled in any single place or (c) careful guesses. I ask because NOTHING
I've read has presented any argument as coherent as yours, with the
consideration of the possible WinNT/95 connection. In fact, many columnists
and technical analysts have raised the same '95vsNT questions. What YOU say
makes sense, but what the columnists have presented, and what Microsoft's hype
implies, does not.
Then again, maybe our reluctance to embrace any Windows-based system is due to
the fact that we're just dinosaurs who like the c-prompt. 😉 Neither have we
really kept up-to-date on the literature over the past couple months, so we're
hopelessly behind the times. 😉
As Alan Iglesias has already said in fewer words, you are both articulate and
persuasive. Thanks for the comments.
-Eric