#Which is better?
16-Sep-95 20:15:02
Sb: #Which is better?
Fm: Bob W. Bennett 102706,2222
To: Chris Shepard 102076,276
Reply RE: Vlab & V-Flyer
Two very different machines.
Both can take video/audio in, cut it up, paste it and play it
back. In excellent quality.
They accomplish it in very different ways (American vs. German)
The Flyer would be the machine of choice IF you wanted fairly
easy setup, quick effects (since all transitions are real time) and didn't want
to spend a whole lot of time discovering new ways to do new things. My first
thought is that this would be great for quick news stories and the like.
Vlab, on the other hand, takes a little extra time to learn,
tweek for your tastes, and learn. It does, however give you an unbelievable
advantage in versaitility in multiple picture effects and quality of digital
effects. All effects (except cuts) are rendered, thus the speed is machine
dependent (not too much different than the Media 100). I would compare the
Vlab more closely to the Media 100 system than to the Flyer. The software is
not developed in the same direction (yet) as the Media 100, but that's just the
German way. The Vlab time line has virtually unlimited (well, OK, limited by
1000 effects, video streams, and sound streams) simultaneous events., but you
actually have to build the dramatic effects from elements. In short, if you're
doing Post Production, or Pre-Production, and want to knock the socks off your
clients, the Vlab (once learned) is the way to go. It doesn't have the
tell-tale canned effects look of the Toaster.
By the way, I use both the Video Toaster (in an A2000) and a Vlab
Motion (in an A3000) feeding each other, depending on the application.