#Which is better?
04-Oct-95 14:31:52
Sb: #48393-#Which is better?
Fm: Dirk Taggesell 100740,3311
To: Paul Idol 76375,1776
I wrote:
>>V-Lab Motion is intended to be a consumer product. Therefore it is not
designed for a profesional editor.<<
Paul wrote:
As far as the video quality, you're right. But there's nothing stopping the
interface from being good. In fact, from my discussions with NoahJi's, MS has
started heading in this direction more and more, so maybe it's just a matter of
time.
May be I understand You wrong (my english is not that good), but the term
"good" is naturally a bit subjective. One loves it, another hates it.
I, as a computer guy, not an editor, like the concept of Movieshop, especially
the RPN Timeline mode. Other people may find this irritating because it doesn't
follow the two-input-one-output analogy.
I wrote:
>>but due to the fact that You can work nondestructive, place the master scene
twice or three times in the timeline, with trimming the end or the beginning of
the copies with the mouse (this feature is AFAIK not mentioned in the
manual).<<
Paul wrote:
It's implemented in a very problematic manner. For example, since you can't
set in and out points for a scene (misnamed, btw) that stick with that scene,
that mousing trick you mention than has to be duplicated with actual
alterations in another window, instead of just being able to drag the
mouse-trimmed scene over to the scenes window and have the trimmed footage
still available but not played. The only way around this is to group the
footage on the timeline, but that's no good either, because it makes future
changes much more difficult.
Yes, there's no way to set in and out points for trimming in the scene window,
which is a small disadvantage.
regards,
Dirk Taggesell