words
Albert:
>> *re-architected* <<
It was I who objected to this newly coined bastardization, to see it
proliferate is tantamount to viewing a cancer grow. SuperPrint and CGW be
damned! <G>
>> As I recall, you objected to "re-archictectured" and perhaps you may object
even more to "re-architected". <<
Nope, you've got it backwards but "re-architectured" is equally foolish and
awkward in its sound.
I have no delusions that my opinion on this topic is going to keep this new
word from spreading. I'm just going on record that I think the term
"re-architected" appeals to me as much as a sharp stick in the eye.
– Bob Ritger