AT/SMG announcement
26-Oct-95 21:30:28
Sb: #216710-AT/SMG announcement
Fm: Ian J. Einman 74271,2766
To: dave leeds 74454,3165
>>As I understand it, dealers were being charged for parts that were to be
supplied free. When he refused to pay, they put his account up for collection.
This may sound scary, but it tells me something about SMG that may not be
totally negative. You may see this as a sign they are creepy, but I see
possible signs they are: serious, aggressive, and have strong financial and
business skills, even if they're mean.
Microsoft is a dominant company because they are pushy aggressive a**h*les, not
because they have always said "don't worry, we understand" whenever an
intercompany dispute arose. Whatever SMG's reasons were, they may have
involved deep concern over the future of the Amiga: I would want to collect
any money owed to me by Amiga dealers ASAP too, because they could go belly up
etc. So even if a little rude, maybe they also have a little piss and vinegar
we need.
CBM had patents they could have sued to protect. SMG is the type of company
that might sue to protect them. Which sounds more like Microsoft, Intel, or
IBM? Who will win….