CompuServe Messages

#CAD

    02-Nov-87 01:33:49
Sb: #91774-#CAD
Fm: Joel Halbert 73147,353
To: Ben Blish 72667,1341
Ben, you are remembering correctly about my PCLO comments. However, you may never have read the message(s) in which I completely dismembered the performance of DCAD. Admittedly, the DCAD I looked at was also one of the earlier releases – but it had a LONG way to go. I have indeed looked at your SCHEME upload (was there more that one?). I thought it was pretty good, though I had some trouble figuring out a few of the functions – I don't think the ARC file included any particular documentation. The file requester was interesting, but didn't seem to work in several respects. I run with VD0:, could that hose things up even when using the requester for dfx:? Anyway, I am considering Scheme, though I do a lot of drawing stuff as well as schematic capture. I have heard a few things about X-CAD, which is not out yet. It sounds good too, though DCAD sounded excellent before I saw it. Just because I'm not buying PCLO doesn't mean that I wouldn't consider Scheme, or any other software you do! On the other hand, it doesn't mean I would buy it with no second thoughts either… I use these things a lot, but I'm still running on my own budget. Things would be different (and maybe will be) if I cajole the "corporation" into buying me an Amiga at work. I'm very glad you are writing EE CAD tools, and I'm not going to hold it against you that they aren't always _exactly_ what I need at the price. Our work often has unusual requirements, which are not easily addressed by the widely-selling programs on the market. My plotter comments to Barry illustrate my position also – I understand what I could do with the better stuff, but I've got to keep my budget under control too. Joel