486 Benchmark rendertest
21-Jan-95 22:39:14
Sb: #148215-486 Benchmark rendertest
Fm: Dennis Fenske 72163,3252
To: Dennis Fenske 72163,3252
Reza and all;
For what it is worth, I decided to get a pentium (even if I can't
afford it). This is my own benchmark of CPU's. (If anyone is
interested).
Below are results of systems I have tried.
For reasons I cannot explain, the AMD 80Mhz chip on two occasions was slower
than the Intel 66Mhz chip.
Why would this happen?
I did a benchmark on 4 systems. The 486-25 is the one I have had for
3 years. It has worked well.
486-25Mhz Intel, 486DX2-66Mhz Intel, 486DX2-80Mhz AMD
I ran the following renders with these results. All were from frame zero
single renders to the screen except Plasma which was frame 25.
Pentium 100Mhz 80Mhz 66Mhz 25Mhz
57Chevy :40 1:40 1:53 3:41
Birdshow :37 1:38 1:51 3:43
Chopper :14 :39 :42 1:25
OldCity3 :11 :30 :34 1:06
Here is where it gets different. I purchased the Plasma IPAS and ran
Plasma2 :05 :18 :14 :27
Spheres :20 :57 :45 2:08
And then this is back to what I would expect.
Water5 1:17 3:38 3:47 7:50
Spheres is just a bunch of spheres I made up of different sizes, colors,
textures, and bump maps.
I believe that Water5 is also from the IPAS I bought.
Can anyone explain why the 66Mhz would be faster on two tests than the 80 Mhz?
I am trying to decide which to purchase. I cannot afford a Pentium at this
time.
I am also thinking of a Cyrix 80Mhz chip, but have no data on it.
Thanks,
Dennis