#To OS\2 or Not To OS/2
26-Jan-95 14:15:24
Sb: #149174-#To OS\2 or Not To OS/2
Fm: Marion K. Marks 70700,2777
To: Jimmy Giliberti [COMPAQ] 72310,2770
Why then have at least two separate independent benchmarks shown OS/2 Warp
to be slower — as much as 60% slower in some cases — than 2.11 in the same
identical exact tasks? That's two independent benchmarks out of two that I've
seen, thus 100% of the ones that I've seen so far. Both said that EVERY aspect
of OS/2 Warp other than the user-interface was noticeably to significantly
slower than 2.11.