CompuServe Messages

#ILM

    24-Nov-93 16:33:45
Sb: #67527-#ILM
Fm: Aaron Weintraub 70222,557
To: John Tissavary 71054,15
I guess you've proved me wrong. Thanks. I'm still not sure on where the initial direction comes from. I guess it depends on the size of the production and how many people are working on it. Using your example about lighting a guy's face: Wouldn't the director be the one who says "I want this to look scary" or "I want him to look friendly", and then let the lighting guy do whatever he does to make it look that way? It would seem to me, and I could be wrong, that what the lighting guy does after that involves a lot of technical knowledge and creativity in how to go about something, but he's not saying "I want to make this guy look scary", he's taking orders from the director. I think, though, that what James said about having to consider that a production is not a one person deal is true. You can't think about it like you think about traditional art. There's a team of artists, each with their own specialty, all working together rather than a brain-child of one person. I just thought of something else to argue my first point. When you watch a film and then talk critically about it, you usually give all the credit to the director. If you say something like "Mr. Director used harsh shadows and contrasts to give a sense of eerieness (sp?) to the dungeon scenes" are you giving credit to the wrong person? Should you be saying "That gaffer did a great job"? Just a thought. Aaron