#Ami Imagine 3.1
Jim,
>> The client just spent $70K or more on a nifty new nonlinear system,
>> and the JPEG artifacts are so bad it looks like a consumer VHS dub
I often see comments like this, and it usually turns out that the maker of them
saw a low-resolution image without realizing it.
Avid rates its resolutions with its own numbering system. AVR-1 (AVR=Avid
Video Resolution) is the worst image quality but takes up the least space, and
it goes right up through AVD-27, which was just introduced. A common practice
is to do your offline at AVR-2 or -3, then when everything is "locked in,"
redigitize only the footage actually used in the production at the highest
resolution. The Avid will do that automatically.
I doubt you could tell which is AVR-27 and which is the original source
footage, unless the source is something like a test pattern captured straight
to D1. I certainly can't find identifiable JPEG artifacts anywhere in it, and
I'm pretty darned picky.
The only trouble with 27 is that it is SO data-intensive it requires striped
drives (a process in which drives are arranged in hardware pairs — say, 2
nine-gig drives, side by side — and the data is divided between them so they
can keep up with the flow.
Pete